So, Iām from SourceCred so biased, but do want to point out that nobody was expecting this kind of explosive growth, both in number of new community members and token price. Thus far, weāve only chosen to actively encourage SourceCred use in smaller, more high-trust communities, for this very reason. We knew gaming would be an issue, and we wanted to build more mitigation measures before advising it for use in more adversarial environments. We have a page on Trust Levels in our docs that explains our thinking here. But, here we are. And I have to say, Iām very impressed with how the 1Hive community has handled this. On the social level via moderation, but also just the intelligent discourse around these issues, the ability to collaborate with SourceCred to build mitigation measures (role-based Cred minting, channel-weighted minting, etc.). I know itās gotta be hella frustrating in the trenches, but the mitigation measures are coming in hot! Iām confident that between mitigation features, moderation and governance (e.g. decreasing rewards if necessary) the community will be able to make it work. Iāve seen it work in SourceCred, which over the last year has distributed > $700k worth of its own token. Iāve seen it work in MakerDAO, where we did see some gaming initially, but mitigated it with minting on trust levels in Discourse. 1Hive is a bigger step up than we were planning, and is requiring more work than anticipated, but what Iām seeing here looks like 1Hive making that step. Itās really impressive, and If 1Hive can work out these issues, get SourceCred humming again, this hive mind could be unstoppableā¦